The seminar influenced my thinking by opening up a wider range of topics for discussion. Being able to hear the opinions of my classmates made it easier for me to understand the text. The discussion truly made me put myself into the shoes of the characters, and try to imagine just what it would have felt like to be them. Much of the discussion focused on the relationship between Baba and Amir, as well as the dramatic changes they endure when they immigrate to the U.S. A particularly interesting question that I had not thought of in depth before was whether or not refugees should be seen as cowardly for leaving their countries in a time of war. While reading the book, I had not thought much about the this concept of cowardice, and I though it was an interesting question that sparked some very diverse responses.
The statement that I agreed with the most was that Amir would probably never be able to forgive himself for what he let happen to Hassan. Many of my classmates agreed with this statement, and added on that Amir may constantly try to make up for his actions, but life without regrets is an impossible feat. The statement that I least agree with is that refugees can be considered cowards because they fled their countries in times of war. I personally believe that if a person is placed in a dangerous, life threatening situation, it is only logical and fair that they be allowed to leave. Refugees are often innocent people, who have been caught up violence, which in many cases, seems impossible to stop. I think it is unfair to deny refugees the change to move to other countries and try to make better lives for themselves, and even their families. If there had been more time for discussion, I would have liked to further discuss the life of Hassan, and how it compares to that of Amir. I am still puzzled by Hassan’s unfaltering loyalty, the fact that he would drop anything to help Amir, the fact that he wore black for 40 days in mourning for Baba. I think it would have been very interesting to discuss the idea of loyalty, and see if my classmates valued it, gave it, and to what extent.
I think that the group did very well at being courteous and allowing those who were speaking to finish their thoughts before sharing their own opinions. This particular seminar group was composed of those who tend to dominate the discussions, which I was the discussion leader for. A great thing about this discussion was the number of different ideas people had. I felt like each individual person had adequately prepared, which made it easy for the discussion to flow and cover a wide range of topics. Because everybody in the group was courteous I felt comfortable speaking and knew that I would not be interrupted by anybody, and took care not to interrupt anybody. The combination of everybody sharing their ideas whenever they could, as well as allowing others to speak created a stimulating discussion, that was able to dig deeper into a lot of the themes of The Kite Runner.
A particular area that could use improvement would be the amount of time spent on each topic of discussion. I felt that the discussion lingered on some topics and ideas, namely the relationship between Baba and Amir, as well as how they were faring in the U.S. While these topics are complex, and have many areas that can be analyzed, the discussion got to the point where it seemed like people were repeating others, or themselves. Avoiding this would make discussions less redundant and open up other important topics and themes for discussion.